Mine exploration, photographs and mining history for mine explorers, industrial archaeologists, researchers and historians aditnow.co.uk

AditNow YouTube mine exploration videos AditNow Facebook Group
Search for mines by country, zone and mineral type: Country:


OS Landranger sheet:
Mineral/product:

Only mines with content
Quick a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
Search mines by name: (Tip: do not include the words mine or quarry, just search on the name e.g. 'cwmorthin')
'Sounds like search' (useful if you are not quite sure how to spell the mine name)
Quick a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
Search photographs by keyword: (Tip: narrow down your search by entering more than one word and selecting all words or exact)
Search for any word
Search for all words
Exact search
Search the forum by keyword: (Tip: narrow down your search by entering more than one word and selecting all words or exact)
Search for any word
Search for all words
Exact search

Mine Exploration Forum

Author Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
davel

Avatar of davel

Joined: 24/07/2007
Location: Gwynedd

View Profile
View Posts
View Personal Album
View Personal Files
View all Photos
Send Private Message
Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
Posted: 18/12/2010 12:27:11
Reply |  Quote
While we're comparing cameras ... has anybody an opinion on Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12?

Dave
IP: 195.137.87.110
RJV

Avatar of RJV

Joined: 16/03/2008
Location: Cleveland

View Profile
View Posts
View Personal Album
View Personal Files
View all Photos
Send Private Message
Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
Posted: 18/12/2010 12:36:00
Reply |  Quote
Having owned a P6000 I'd probably take it for granted that the P7000 is a great camera however I'd want to have a very good look at one first as the only falling down point with the P6000 was a Mickey Mouse lens assembly which failed as soon as it got a bit of grit in it.

--

Rich
IP: 82.4.12.54
toadstone

Avatar of toadstone

Joined: 10/09/2007
Location: Father's Dwelling, Big Low

View Profile
View Posts
View Personal Album
View Personal Files
View all Photos
Send Private Message
Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
Posted: 18/12/2010 21:29:27
Reply |  Quote
RJV wrote:

Having owned a P6000 I'd probably take it for granted that the P7000 is a great camera however I'd want to have a very good look at one first as the only falling down point with the P6000 was a Mickey Mouse lens assembly which failed as soon as it got a bit of grit in it.


A little unfair methinks. None of these cameras are really designed to be subjected conditions found underground in mines. You can however get round the problem quite successfully. Most of these advanced Point & Shoot cameras (particularly Canon & Nikon) have the ability to use add on lenses. This requires an adaptor tube and rather than using the lens on the end just replace it with a daylight/UV filter. The camera's lens assembly can then extend and close without worrying about grit and to a certain extent water.

I regularly fly these cameras up to 500 feet below kites and in damp windy conditions the pressure on the lens assembly can allow condensation to occur inside the lens assembly. By using the extension tube and filter it eliminates the problem. Also has the added bonus of protecting the lens on heavy/crash landings. Shocked

Peter.
IP: 81.135.86.143
davel

Avatar of davel

Joined: 24/07/2007
Location: Gwynedd

View Profile
View Posts
View Personal Album
View Personal Files
View all Photos
Send Private Message
Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
Posted: 18/12/2010 22:06:58
Reply |  Quote
Perhaps I should have said that I'm not looking for a camera specifically for underground use - I'm looking for a good general purpose camera, smaller than a DSLR and with a viewfinder.

Dave
IP: 195.137.87.110
RJV

Avatar of RJV

Joined: 16/03/2008
Location: Cleveland

View Profile
View Posts
View Personal Album
View Personal Files
View all Photos
Send Private Message
Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
Posted: 18/12/2010 22:32:09
Reply |  Quote
The comment regarding the Nikon is by no means unfair. The P7000 appears to have a very similar lens construction to the P6000 and a Google search for 'P6000 Lens Errors' will reveal that the flimsy construction causes problems for all users which is a shame really as the body is bombproof. Don't doubt that it will be a great camera to use though.



--

Rich
IP: 82.4.12.54
ogof

Joined: 10/07/2008
Location: Portsmouth

View Profile
View Posts
View Personal Album
View Personal Files
View all Photos
Send Private Message
Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
Posted: 19/12/2010 07:31:46
Reply |  Quote
I have a G10 and that is a great little camera, but will only do a 15 second exposure which is a bit of a pain for underground pictures. IP: 82.24.233.98
toadstone

Avatar of toadstone

Joined: 10/09/2007
Location: Father's Dwelling, Big Low

View Profile
View Posts
View Personal Album
View Personal Files
View all Photos
Send Private Message
Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
Posted: 19/12/2010 10:33:42
Reply |  Quote
ogof wrote:

I have a G10 and that is a great little camera, but will only do a 15 second exposure which is a bit of a pain for underground pictures.


It's a pity you have the G10 and not one of the other Canon Gs as they will support CHDK (Canon Hacking Development Kit).
This allows you to override many of the set parameters such as the exposure time but even then only up to 64 secs I think it is.
The CHDK Wiki can be found here: [link]
The latest build for all supported Canon camera variants can be found here:[link]

It allows you to other things too which may or may not be helpful underground. This is an example of the motion detection feature: [link]
and here is one of my better examples of time lapse:[link]

Peter.
IP: 81.135.86.143
SimonRL

Avatar of SimonRL

Joined: 27/11/2005
Location: North Wales

View Profile
View Posts
View Personal Album
View Personal Files
View all Photos
Send Private Message
Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
Posted: 19/12/2010 19:54:43
Reply |  Quote
I can second Rich's comments on the P6000.

It's a cracking camera, it takes great photographs (a bit over processed looking at times IMO), the lens is nice and sharp (as you'd expect from Nikon) and the construction of the camera itself is great.

But he's not exagerating about the lens. It really is very fragile and seems quite at odds with the rest of the camera construction.

The P7000 looks tougher, but I don't know whether they've beefed up the lens at all. It is quite a bulky camera for a compact. All that said it didn't do well in a DPReview against the Canon S95 and Lumix LX5 [link]

The Canon G11 seems to score well in reviews, although I've not seen a detailed review of the G12. I've have considered either of these when instead of the Lumix I bought (which fails your requirement for an optical viewfinder which admittedly is a pain) but I don't ever want another underground camera with a retractable lens.

--

indicative of the type of individual found at the periphery of a fringe activity
IP: 95.148.102.104 Edited: 19/12/2010 20:04:01 by SimonRL
davel

Avatar of davel

Joined: 24/07/2007
Location: Gwynedd

View Profile
View Posts
View Personal Album
View Personal Files
View all Photos
Send Private Message
Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
Posted: 19/12/2010 21:11:09
Reply |  Quote
simonrl wrote:

... I don't ever want another underground camera with a retractable lens.

As mentioned previously, I don't want to use it underground - there's far too many people on this forum taking really excellent photos for me to want to compete.

Anyway ... it's all a bit academic now - I've ordered a G12. I handled one some time back and it it seemed very nice and it's got generally good reviews.

Ask me in a few months time if I made the right choice. Whatever, I'm sure it's going to be better than my nine-year-old 3 Mpx P&S.

Dave
IP: 195.137.87.110
SimonRL

Avatar of SimonRL

Joined: 27/11/2005
Location: North Wales

View Profile
View Posts
View Personal Album
View Personal Files
View all Photos
Send Private Message
Nikon P7000 vs Canon G12
Posted: 19/12/2010 22:00:02
Reply |  Quote
davel wrote:

As mentioned previously, I don't want to use it underground - there's far too many people on this forum taking really excellent photos for me to want to compete.


Fair point, but while I was describing the issue in the context of underground use, I had the slidy bit that covers the lens on my P6000 jam because of a grain of sand. And from that point I tended to have to prod it to get it to open fully!

davel wrote:

Anyway ... it's all a bit academic now - I've ordered a G12. I handled one some time back and it it seemed very nice and it's got generally good reviews.


The G12 looks an excellent camera, the G9, G10 and G11 always had excellent reviews.

davel wrote:

Whatever, I'm sure it's going to be better than my nine-year-old 3 Mpx P&S.


Get the old one underground and get some photos of the less photographed mines of the area Wink

--

indicative of the type of individual found at the periphery of a fringe activity
IP: 95.148.103.89 Edited: 19/12/2010 22:11:19 by SimonRL
Bookmark with Del.icio.us Digg This! Post to Reddit Share on Facebook Post to StumbleUpon Post to Kaboodle Bookmark with Yahoo Bookmark with Google
Contact?

If you have any questions at all about mine exploration or the AditNow web site please get in touch:

info@aditnow.co.uk
Problems?

Spotted any problems with the web site, or any inaccuracies or errors in the information on here? Please let us know:

info@aditnow.co.uk
Moore Books: Specialist Books I.A. Recordings: Mining and Industrial History DVDs Explore a Disused Welsh Slate Mine Romic-Ace Industrial Locomotive Sales
Disclaimer: Mine exploring can be quite dangerous, but then again it can be alright, it all depends on the weather. Please read the proper disclaimer.
© 2005 to 2010 AditNow.co.uk
Top of Page